1) What was the biggest surprise for you in the reading? In other words, what did you read that stood out the most as different from your expectations?
2) Identify at least one part of the reading that was confusing to you.
3) If you were able to ask two questions to the author, what would you ask? Why?
4) Was there anything you think the author was wrong about? Where do you disagree with what she or he said? How?
1. One of the biggest surprises I first realized while reading was the idea of Innovation comes from Demographic changes.I had no idea or thought that the age and population would be a factor of innovation.
2. The most confusing part was the nature of the creative process. The table (5.2) explains adaptor and innovator but doesn't really make comparisons or explain well. Nor does it actually explain the difference of creativity.
3. The first question I would ask the author is about the creative process with real world examples. The book gives great detail about the step by step process but it is not relatable to me. The second question i would ask the author is the arenas of creativity and what makes each event different and how did he come up with so many? Some of them seem like they are the same which means i probably don't understand them all.
4. I feel as though innovation is not always creating the product like in the principles of innovation section. innovation can be only ideas that can be shared with others allowing more word to be done with the product.
No comments:
Post a Comment